“Artrepenuers,” A Maladjusted Perspective
Art world career advice encourages artists to self-identify as entrepreneurs. Think yourself as a business. Serious artists already do this; they track art-related expenses, keep receipts and market their work. But should artists view themselves as entrepreneurial super creatures to attain financial success and recognition?
I say no. Making a living as an artist is a tricky enterprise best approached with a trust fund and/or easy access to capital. Only the few art hipsters roaming late night urban party scenes possess these rare attributes. Even rich parents are of little use, unless one can finagle complete financial and emotional support. Most artists struggle to create and market their art while working at another job.
Those that manage to make a living off their art eventually resent the work that sells unless they've actually attained art star status. There’s a reason it’s called the bottom line: net profit equals degree of livelihood. For most artists, their "real" work is antithetical to the bottom line because it is harder to sell. Successful artists keep their nose to the grindstone and eventually arrive at some utopia where they shed their financial worries.
The artistic process typically does not factor for deadlines, trends, the Dow-Jones, marketing and revenue. The notion of artist as entrepreneur seduces artists into believing that all they have to do is identify as an "artreprenuer" and success will follow. Tracking expenses, e-marketing, contacting galleries and applying for exhibitions are only a good start. The real work lies in positioning one’s art to sell. Now, that’s a process.
And that brings artists back to the same old million dollar question: How to sell your art. Whereto find one’s artistic niche. All the good stuff artist self-help advice purports to cover but really doesn't.

